F&B Codex builds named role agents — Regulatory, Quality, R&D — trained on your SOPs, your specs, and your house conventions. Every output is cited to a primary source, gated on a named human, and ends with a signed audit footer. The work product your auditor accepts.
CONTAINS: tree-nut allergen statement.FALCPA · §101.22Every mid-market food brand runs on PDFs, spreadsheets, email threads, and one overworked QA or regulatory lead. Enterprise platforms (TraceGains, SafetyChain, FoodLogiQ) are six-month implementations at $50K–$250K. Database tools (Genesis, ESHA) are built for a human formulator. Neither sells the thing a Director of Quality at a $40M brand actually wants — a senior regulatory professional, on call, at FTE-fraction pricing.
Shipping in priority order. Codex Reg is live; Codex Quality starts build once Codex Reg has five paying pilots; Codex R&D follows once Codex Quality is in build. One agent at a time — each has to earn its place before we move on to the next.
US packaged-food label compliance, supplement and functional-beverage claims substantiation, multi-state shipping diffs with Prop 65 and AB 418 analysis. Every output cited to a primary source. Every output ends with a signed audit footer.
The full QC + QA function. Raw-material doc review through pre-release batch review, SOPs, CAPA, audit binders. Grounded on your house SOPs and release criteria.
Spec review, formulation, DOE, NFP and ingredient and allergen statement generation with §101.9 rounding. Grounded on your house formulas.
Beyond Phase 1: Codex Label · Codex Supply · Codex Sourcing · the rest of the org chart. See the full roadmap →
Every food company operates differently. The work is bound by internal SOPs, house spec templates, release criteria, brand voice, and a hundred small conventions that aren't written down anywhere. Generic AI doesn't know your company. F&B Codex does.
Your SOPs, spec templates, release criteria, brand voice, and supplier history get ingested into a per-tenant knowledge base on day one. Your SOPs become the agent's citation source and its guardrails.
Per-tenant directories. Per-tenant retrieval. Your content is never used to train a shared model and never appears in another customer's output, even when both source from the same supplier.
After 30 days, the agent sounds like a member of your team. After 6 months, it carries institutional memory most of your team doesn't. Leaving means starting that over. That's the switching cost we build.
Brand X — under $10M revenue, gluten-free claim across two SKU concepts, 10-state Year-1 launch plan. Codex Reg surfaced a 21 CFR §101.91 gluten-free / barley conflict embedded in the brand's own strategic plan — plus three unsupportable marketing claims and a California Prop 65 work plan — in one review cycle.
No procurement. No six-month implementation. No SOC2 questionnaire blocking the kickoff. One scoping call, one one-page agreement, three sample artifacts — and Codex Reg is reviewing your real work.
Pick one workflow. Send three sample artifacts (a label, a claim, a state list). One named pilot owner on your side. You leave with a fixed scope, a fixed price, and a draft pilot agreement landing by end of next business day.
90 days. $1,500/mo. Mutual NDA. Per-tenant data isolation. Liability cap. Exit clause. Six promises in plain English. You can read it in five minutes; outside counsel can review it in twenty.
We ingest your SOPs, spec templates, release criteria, and brand voice into your per-tenant KB. This is the part that makes the agent yours. The grounding stays per-tenant, never crosses customer boundaries, and compounds every week you keep us.
Submit a task. Within one business day, three artifacts arrive: a human-readable report, a structured findings JSON, and a signed audit footer. Every BLOCKER and every claim rewrite is gated on a named human checkpoint in your workflow.